Beyond the AI Demo: Unpacking the Hidden Costs and Human Toll

TL;DR:
Everyone claims AI is revolutionizing productivity but most people I talk to aren’t seeing it. This piece is a grounded take on the gap between AI hype and real-world results. There are gains in narrow tasks and for junior staff, but the impact is uneven. Often overstated and rarely transformational these are. In this article, I explore what is actually working (xx context engineering xx), the human cost and why a 15% lift might be more honest and valuable than the overused '100% AI win' headline. No buzzwords. Just the truth.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I get it ..  The word AI is everywhere these days. It feels like you can't scroll through LinkedIn or finish a work day without tripping over the acronym. Every company, every guru and every deck promises mind-blowing 30%, 50% even 100% gains in everything from customer support to coding. It’s enough to make your head spin.

Last week at a tech mixer in Coventry, I caught up with Olivia, Head of Digital Operations at a Global FI whom I have known and interacted for years. As she sipped her Matcha tea, she looked up and said,

“My inbox is full of AI pitches. They all promise 50% productivity gains. But when I ask my team if they feel it I get blank stares from them”

That very well aligned with the frustration across several other tech leaders. While pitch decks and tech pundits proclaim a new era of AI led efficiency improvement, the ground reality is complicated.

The last 18 months have been a parade of promises. Every company claims to have unlocked a new level of productivity. But in reality? For many of us, the “wow” moment hasn’t arrived. 

So in this article I want to talk about what is real, what is overblown and what it actually takes to make it really useful from an enterprise lens.

So, is AI really helping?

The data does show improvements. There are credible, peer-reviewed studies that point to meaningful gains. But context matters.

For eg., In customer support, AI tools assisting agents at a Fortune 500 company led to a 13.8% bump in issues resolved per hour. More strikingly, newer reps saw productivity jump by 35%. However, in case of experienced reps.. No change.

Consultants using GPT-4 in structured problem solving scenarios performed tasks 25% faster with 40% higher quality output. Developers using GitHub Copilot completed certain tasks 55% faster. I do have to accept that these are not trivial gains.

But here is what rarely makes the headlines,

• These wins occur in narrow, clearly defined workflows.

• The biggest beneficiaries are often junior team members.

• Gains are real but they are neither universal nor transformative across the board.

The hidden tax: What we don’t talk about

With automation of simple tasks, boredom increases. A Harvard Business Review study found that while productivity rose, motivation dropped. Humans don’t thrive when relegated to passive oversight.

Olivia echoed that,

"They piloted AI generated first drafts for client reports. Fast? Absolutely. But then came the rewriting, fact-checking, correcting tone. Senior analysts felt like glorified editors."

 As she put it rightly,

“We didn’t save time. We just moved the pain downstream.”

Others report growing loneliness and a weakening of team dynamics. AI eats up the simple back and forths where collaboration often sparks.

And when it hallucinates? The time you spend fixing it can undo any net gain.

There is also de-skilling. If AI handles routine work, where do future experts get their reps?

Why the hype still dominates

There is a reason the AI narrative is so seductive. VCs, consultants, and media outlets thrive on transformation stories. “10x improvements” and “trillion dollar potential” grab attention.

What you don’t see? The rollout struggles. The data governance headaches. The reality that most of these early wins happen in sandboxed environments and not messy enterprise eco systems.

The incentives are off. Enterprises want to look modern. Analysts want to make bold calls. So the average operator is left navigating a world where the message and the experience rarely match.

So what is working? Context engineering !!!

The most interesting development isn’t the models themselves, it is how we feed and manage them. That is where context engineering comes in.

Context engineering is the art of giving LLMs just the right background, structure, memory and tools so they can reliably complete a task. Think of it as designing a cockpit where the AI knows what instrument to look at, what buttons to press and when to ask for help.

That means:

• Supplying rich, relevant context dynamically

• Orchestrating external tools and APIs

• Designing retrieval pipelines and guardrails

• Tracking what the model knows and remembers

Without this, LLMs sound confident but collapse on detail. With it, they will become useful collaborators.

System of record? That’s a big shift.

Andreessen Horowitz recently noted that LLMs may evolve from tools to systems of record.. housing not just content, but decision logic, user history, memory and reasoning.

That is a powerful idea. But it comes with a huge leap in responsibility.

In any Industry, Systems of record need to be:

• Auditable

• Secure

• Explainable

• Integrated

We are not there yet. But if we want LLMs to truly become foundational to enterprise IT, we have to stop treating them like flashy tools and start building them like infrastructure.

What does real progress look like?

Here is the pattern I am seeing it would work:

1. Start small. Choose one painful repetitive workflow with measurable metrics.

2. Pilot AI alongside your people. Don’t replace but augment.

3. Track more than speed. Measure morale, error rates and review cycles.

4. Design for context. Don’t just prompt engineer the environment.

5. Build internal literacy. Help your team think with the tool not just use it.

6. Scale only when the outcome is sustained and trusted.

This is operations not hype. And that is okay.

Final thoughts: 15% is the new 100%

I think it is imperative that enterprises need to be okay with modest, measurable gains. Chasing the dream of 100% automation or 50% uplift leads to frustration.

But if you can boost a workflow by 12–15%, make your team’s day a bit easier and do the work sustainably? That gain itself is huge in the long run.

Real transformation isn’t a keynote. It’s a series of small compounding decisions. And it starts with being honest about what works.

If you're grappling with this shift and want to unpack it further, I’m offering 15-minute video chats on Fridays. No pitch and no jargon just a real face to face conversation.